Question
Starting Date Monday, June 13, 2011
Closing Date Wednesday, June 15, 2011
Total marks 5
Mr Hayat has been hired as a new HR manager in a pharmaceutical company. At the end of orientation, he stood amazed to find no formal practice of performance evaluation of employees in the organization. The owner of the company carries it out as per the word of immediate supervisor. He believes that declining sales, cost and quality assurance carry more importance than the petty issue of performance evaluation of employees while Mr Hayat believes that there must a proper record of all the issues related to the employees so that these may be evaluated at proper time.
Do you think Mr Hayat is right or wrong at his stand? Elaborate logically.
Note: Word Limit is 150. Please observe this limit
Answers
1)
In my view point Decision of Mr. Hayat is right because The employee performance evaluation process, including goal setting, performance measurement, regular performance feedback, employee recognition, and documentation of employee progress, ensures the success. The performance evaluation process—done with care and understanding—helps employees see how their jobs and expected contributions fit within the bigger picture of their organization. The more effective employee performance evaluation processes accomplish these goals and have additional benefits. Documented employee performance evaluations are communication tools that ensure the supervisor and her reporting staff members are clear about the requirements of each employee’s job. The employee performance evaluation also communicates the desired outcomes or outputs needed from each employee’s job and defines how they will be measured. Through employee performance evaluation the employees can also learn
2)
Mr. Hayat is right, because performance evaluation is a mutual benefiting system for both the organization and the employees. No organization can prosper without a motivated team. Practices and researches have proven that the best output producing organizations have well motivated staff.Formal performance evaluation system. This system also help to improve the productivity of an organization by continuous monitoring system that does not allow an idle employee stay for a long time without progressing in the organization.
3)
Starting Date Monday, June 13, 2011
Closing Date Wednesday, June 15, 2011
Total marks 5
Mr Hayat has been hired as a new HR manager in a pharmaceutical company. At the end of orientation, he stood amazed to find no formal practice of performance evaluation of employees in the organization. The owner of the company carries it out as per the word of immediate supervisor. He believes that declining sales, cost and quality assurance carry more importance than the petty issue of performance evaluation of employees while Mr Hayat believes that there must a proper record of all the issues related to the employees so that these may be evaluated at proper time.
Do you think Mr Hayat is right or wrong at his stand? Elaborate logically.
Note: Word Limit is 150. Please observe this limit
Answers
1)
In my view point Decision of Mr. Hayat is right because The employee performance evaluation process, including goal setting, performance measurement, regular performance feedback, employee recognition, and documentation of employee progress, ensures the success. The performance evaluation process—done with care and understanding—helps employees see how their jobs and expected contributions fit within the bigger picture of their organization. The more effective employee performance evaluation processes accomplish these goals and have additional benefits. Documented employee performance evaluations are communication tools that ensure the supervisor and her reporting staff members are clear about the requirements of each employee’s job. The employee performance evaluation also communicates the desired outcomes or outputs needed from each employee’s job and defines how they will be measured. Through employee performance evaluation the employees can also learn
2)
Mr. Hayat is right, because performance evaluation is a mutual benefiting system for both the organization and the employees. No organization can prosper without a motivated team. Practices and researches have proven that the best output producing organizations have well motivated staff.Formal performance evaluation system. This system also help to improve the productivity of an organization by continuous monitoring system that does not allow an idle employee stay for a long time without progressing in the organization.
3)
In my opinion the Mr.Hayat is right because performance evaluation process has lot of benefits for both employee and organizations. Because it motivated the staff and give more production to the organization. By performance evaluation goal are well settled and clear for employee. Performance evolution is communication tool that what a employee needed for doing jobs and what is outcome and output.
No comments:
Post a Comment